Comments on: Sigg’s BPA Deception

By: David

David — Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:26:07 +0000

There’s a way to completely end this discussion of bottle safety: use glass. But it’s heavy, and you don’t want to carry it with you… is a little weight worth the time and effort spent to decode the industrial mysteries of bottle manufacturers? If so, carry on. If not, re-use the glass bottles that you already have and get on with your life.

By: BPA in the NY Times | SierraDescents.com - Climb Up and Ski Down

BPA in the NY Times | SierraDescents.com - Climb Up and Ski Down — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:51:03 +0000

[...] in test animals. If you’ve been following the BPA Saga (including this impressive bit of corporate nastiness by Sigg), you’ll see that the latest bit of research keeps upping the ante on the potential ill [...]

By: Marc

Marc — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:58:57 +0000

Thanks for this. I lost track of the whole BPA-water bottle saga and have been using an older SIGG bottle and a newer BPA-free Nalgene one. I figured I was fine. I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect consumers to have to parse legalistic statements to figure out if something is safe or not. I won’t be buying anything from SIGG again, regardless of what claims they make about their products.

By: Andy

Andy — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:14:13 +0000

Done.

By: Robert K.

Robert K. — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:21:10 +0000

Would it be worth updating your SIGG bottle review to reflect any new information here?